The majority of international regulatory authorities are obliged by law to have systems in place to verify the GMP status of medicinal product manufacturers whose products are marketed on their territory. Most “developed” regulatory authorities ensure that these manufacturers in their territory are subject to routine GMP inspection. Different approaches are taken to supervision of the manufacture of medicinal products outside a national territory, and to the supervision and inspection of active pharmaceutical ingredients. A number of countries have mutual recognition agreements (MRA) or memoranda of understandings (MoU) with other countries which allow them to rely on results from inspections performed by other countries. However these MRAs or MoUs are often limited in scope, and subject to certain restrictions. A large number of other international collaboration activities are also in place e.g. (V) ICH, WHO prequalification scheme, specific bilateral arrangements between countries, cooperation with EDQM etc.
Since the adoption of the ICH guideline on Quality Risk Management in 2005, the application of risk based approaches to the planning of inspections has increased in importance, and there is increasing interest in additional international collaboration. Recent discussions between EU and US have focused on the possibility of administrative simplification between the regions, and discussions at the FDA international summit in November 2006 highlighted cooperation on inspections as a priority action area. This was further reinforced in the context of the Transatlantic administrative simplification workshop organised in Brussels November 2007 and the 2nd international summit in Dublin in December 2007.
In May 2007, EMEA launched the first phase of its EudraGMP database, which in further releases will allow certain GMP information on inspections performed by all EEA member states, as well as from its MRA partners (including the Australian TGA) and other international partners, to be accessible to the parties concerned. A further release of this database includes a module for sharing inspection plans. The US FDA also shares its GMP status on firms which are inspected by them through its Compliance status database (COMSTAT) with the EMEA and the TGA, along with other international regulatory partners.
The international industry associations have also raised the issue of international duplication of inspection and associated resource on a number of occasions. According to industry sources, EU, US, FDA and Brazil are the most active regulators inspecting in third countries.
The pilot project for active pharmaceutical ingredients taking into account risk based approaches, building on equivalent GMP standards and mutual confidence between international regulators.
As an initial effort to improve international sharing of information and to facilitate more risk based approaches to inspection planning, it was proposed that a small group of interested regulators establish a pilot programme to coordinate inspection planning. This was based on the system currently operating in the EU where the EMEA outlines a yearly plan for centralised inspections and invites all Member States to contribute to this based on their own inspection plans.
Each regulator reserves the right to perform a dedicated “own” inspection, should they consider this necessary.
Each regulator identifies a contact point specifically for inspection planning purposes. Regulators outline the inspections they have carried out during the last 24-36 months and their preliminary inspection plans for the next 18 months. They provide this information to all other regulators involved in the pilot according to an agreed template. Following review of this information, they identify the following:
They communicate this information in a completed form to the other regulators involved. Based on the information received and the common areas of interest identified, the regulatory contact points set up a teleconference to discuss further sites of interest. The object of this teleconference is as follows:
The pilot phase is initially restricted to inspections of active pharmaceutical ingredients and to inspections carried out outside the participating regions. This is without prejudice to other ongoing collaborative work on inspections.
Opportunities for collaboration with the inspectorate of the country where the inspection will take place will also be explored. Although this activity extends beyond the EU and US regions, also involving Australia, the deliverables and outcomes will also be considered within these frameworks.
Following the outcome of the pilot phase, if the program proves to be successful, the parties may consider expanding the scope of the initiative.
![]()

